Please write a discussion post reply of 450 words to the following post. Must have at least 2 scholarly peer-reviewed sources using APA format. Sources must be within the last 5 years. Must include one biblical integration that is NOT to be listed as a resource.
Original post instructions are listed here: Discuss when you would use qualitative research in your work practice and why.
Discuss when you would use quantitative research in your work practice and why.
Post you will reply to is here: Qualitative Research is primarily considered exploratory Research used to understand underlying reasons, opinions, and motivations. Gives insights into the issue and creates thoughts and theories for potential quantitative Research. It is likewise used to reveal the thoughts and opinions of the people and know more about the problem. Qualitative Research collects data in a non-numeric format, using various unstructured or semi-structured techniques (Melnyk& fineout-2023). Quantitative Research is employed to assess a problem by generating data or data that can be converted into statistics. It aims to evaluate attitudes, emotions, behaviors, and other defined factors and draw conclusions from a sample population. This approach utilizes data to articulate facts and uncover patterns in Research. Quantitative Research differs from qualitative Research in several ways, as it works to achieve different goals and uses different methods. The main differences between both Research studies are the method of data sampling, data collection, data analysis, and outcomes that differ from numbers and descriiptions. Qualitative Research is challenging to accomplish using a large group, so the sample size is typically negligible, and the participants are selected to fulfill a specified quota (House, 2018). When examining and recognizing qualitative Research, it is essential to remember that while descriiptive Research is often qualitative, not all qualitative Research can be categorized as descriiptive (Melnyk& Fineout, 2023). Designing research studies needs to adhere to a set of procedural steps. Instead, it necessitates the utilization of types of procedures due to the diversity and complexity in this field of study (Melnyk& fineout-2023). Qualitative Research allows for a deeper understanding that provides a reason within the how and why of decision-making. Qualitative Research uses methods to gather and organize data into patterns or themes (Valdez, 2017).
Qualitative Research has served as a means of gaining a deeper understanding of health professional and patient work (Holden et al., 2015) to improve the work environment and increase patient safety. Moreover, qualitative Research has served as a necessary precursor to quantitative Research, enabling a comprehensive descriiption of a system and its components prior to measuring their relationships as well as a follow-up to quantitative Research, enabling an understanding of the reasons behind statistically significant relationships (Carayon et al., 2015) counter-intuitive results. Qualitative Research also has demonstrated value in advancing the theoretical foundations of health care (Holden et al., 2015). In quantitative Research, the hypothesis is deductively formulated from an existing theory, and then the hypothesis is tested by data collection. Revision of the theory takes place according to the statistical results of Research.
In my workplace, Quantitative Research focuses on gathering data that can be objectively analyzed and measured. We often use this type of Research to track the effectiveness of interventions for individuals with disabilities by collecting data on the frequency of incidents, medication dosage, or hours of therapy received. By using this data-driven approach, we can make decisions adjust care plans, and assess the impact of our services in a quantitative manner.
On the other hand, qualitative Research serves an equally valuable purpose. It helps us gain insights into the experiences, emotions, and perspectives of the individuals we support. For example, we conduct interviews and observations to understand how individuals feel about their living arrangements or the quality of their interactions. This qualitative data allows us to tailor our support to meet needs better while identifying areas where improvements can be made. Ultimately, it helps us provide person-centered care. By combining qualitative and quantitive research methods in our support care setting, we create a comprehensive approach that enhances the quality of care for those we serve. Proverbs 15:22: ”Desire without knowledge is not good – how much more will hasty feet miss the way!”(NIV) reminds us about the significance of seeking advice and guidance in our endeavors. This wisdom holds relevance in the context of healthcare. As healthcare professionals, we aim to provide the best possible care for our patients. Achieving this involves considering all options and viewpoints. Similar to how “lack of counsel leads to failed plans, ” decisions made in healthcare without consulting others or isolating oneself can result in consequences and suboptimal patient outcomes.
In our roles as healthcare providers, nurses, or support staff, we must adopt an approach by seeking input from colleagues, patients, and experts in the field. We establish a network of advisors much like having “many advisers.” This network can offer insights. Help ensure the success of our plans while prioritizing patient safety.
Reference
biblegateway.com/versions/new-international-version-niv-bible/
Carayon, P., Wust, K., Hose, B. Z., & Salwei, M. E. (2021). Human factors and ergonomics in health care. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics, 1417-1437. Holden, R. J., Eriksson, A., Andreasson, J., Williamsson, A., & Dellve, L. (2015). Healthcare workers’ perceptions of lean: A context-sensitive, mixed methods study in three Swedish hospitals. Applied ergonomics, 47, 181-192.
Farghaly, A. (2018). Comparing and Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research Approaches in Education: The Peculiar Situation of Medical Education. Education in Medicine Journal, 10(1)
House, J. (2018). Authentic vs. elicited data and qualitative vs. quantitative research methods in pragmatics: Overcoming two non-fruitful dichotomies. System, pp. 75, 4–12. dor:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.03.014
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overhoult, E. (2023). Evidence-based practice in nursing &
Healthcare: A guide to best practice (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health.
Valdez, R. S., McGuire, K. M., & Rivera, A. J. (2017). Qualitative ergonomics/human factors
Research in health care: Current state and future directions. Applied Ergonomics, 62, 43-
doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.01.