Discuss the underlying assumptions and potential ramifications of having proxy subjective health status or evaluation measures for children or those unable to speak for themselves.
350 word
2 reference
ANSWER
Underlying Assumptions and Potential Ramifications of Proxy Subjective Health Status Measures for Children or Non-Verbal Individuals
Utilizing proxy subjective health status measures, or assessments of an individual’s health provided by someone other than the individual themselves, for children or those unable to speak for themselves raises several underlying assumptions and potential ramifications.
Underlying Assumptions
Proxy Competence: The fundamental assumption is that the proxy, typically a parent or caregiver, possesses the knowledge and understanding to accurately assess the individual’s health status.
Proxy Objectivity: It is assumed that the proxy can provide an objective assessment, free from personal biases or interpretations.
Proxy-Child Alignment: It is assumed that the proxy’s perception of the individual’s health aligns with the individual’s own perception.
Potential Ramifications
Misrepresentation of Health Status: Inaccurate proxy assessments may lead to misdiagnosis, inappropriate treatment, and mismanagement of the individual’s health.
Voice Silencing: Relying solely on proxy assessments may overlook the individual’s own experiences and perspectives, potentially silencing their voice in healthcare decisions.
Cultural Sensitivity: Proxy assessments may fail to capture cultural nuances or differences in health perceptions and expressions.
Power Dynamics: Proxy assessments may reinforce power dynamics between the proxy and the individual, potentially limiting the individual’s autonomy and control over their healthcare.
Mitigating Ramifications
Proxy Training: Providing training to proxies on communication, assessment techniques, and cultural sensitivity can enhance the accuracy and objectivity of proxy assessments.
Child Involvement: Whenever possible, involving the child or non-verbal individual in the assessment process, even if in a limited capacity, can provide valuable insights into their own experiences.
Multiple Perspectives: Gathering information from multiple proxies, such as parents, teachers, or healthcare providers, can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the individual’s health status.
Regular Reassessments: Regularly reassessing the individual’s health status, with both proxy and self-report measures when possible, can help identify changes and ensure ongoing accuracy.
Conclusion
While proxy subjective health status measures can provide valuable information, it is crucial to acknowledge and address the underlying assumptions and potential ramifications of relying solely on these measures. By implementing strategies to mitigate potential drawbacks, we can work towards ensuring that the voices of children and non-verbal individuals are heard and their health concerns are adequately addressed.
References:
Bertelli, M., Di Battista, F., Cella, D., & Doglio, C. (2019). Measuring health-related quality of life in children and adolescents using proxy-reported instruments: A critical review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(1), 21-30.
SweetStudy (2023). Underlying Assumptions and Potential Ramification of Having Proxy Subjective Health Status. Retrieved from https://www.coursehero.com/f