Assess the strengths and weaknesses of the paper, in the following categories. Your analysis of each category should be 200-600 words long. Please use the template and analyze each category separately.
Required categories:
summary of the paper, describing major goals and main points how the organization of content affected readability clarity of writing
adequacy of included content to achieve the writers’ goals
coverage of relevant theoretical frameworks (you might need to find your own theory)
quality of analysis and interpretation (including analysis of past literature)
Additional categories (choose one or more):
quality of methodological choices
connection between data analyses and study goals connection of the results to the broader literature create your own category
As part of your evaluation, describe what the authors could have done differently to improve that aspect of the paper, or provide details justifying why you think the authors did a particularly good job. To achieve outstanding marks, you will need to locate, describe, and make connections to additional literature. You might find this resource useful:
https://www.criticalthinking.org/, including the elements and standards of critical thinking.